Sounds somewhat similar to what my situation in California was. And guess what...premiums were quite high. There are other things playing a big role in costs.
If premiums were based on my driving I probably couldn't afford to insure more than one car, but what they don't know can't hurt them. Anyway, how would you suggest they go about setting the price based on driving?
Should the vehicles report when, where, and how, they are driven? Should we use log books like commercial drivers do? If going by miles driven per year, which is partially already in effect, I should damn near get paid to have insurance.
Never heard of the risk of hitting wildlife being a factor. If so, my premiums could be higher. There's plenty of elk, deer, and free range cattle (in the summer) here. And at least a couple of people per year die from hitting deer within less than 10 miles of here.
If I had any say so in the matter I'd like to see the driver, not the vehicles, being insured. I can only drive one at a time.