- Member ID
- #1483
- Messages
- 1,510
- Reactions
- 13,092
- Likes
- 212
- City
- Walland
- State
- TN
- Country
- United States
- Vehicle
- 21 Challenger Super Stock
I keep going back and forth on the Charger, I guess I am hopeful that the Charger can be what I would like it to be (a muscle car)... on one hand I look at the design and see a link back to the 68/69 Charger. That's arguably one of the most beautiful car designs to ever hit the street - so thats a pretty good start. But, then I see the 70 Hemi-Cuda transforming into the 74 318 Barracuda - the design and shape are the same. The problem is in the application.
There is more than one aspect that makes a car desirable, the design, the "powerplant", quality, and I will list the last aspect as features, (think of a Cadillac vs a loaded Oldsmobile - the Cadillac commands more money because it's a Cadillac).
The Charger sort of has a desirable design, but the powerplant is more like a 4 cylinder than Hemi, (some might say it has 500ish EV horses, but its not the same as ICE - not even close), the quality is an unknown at this point, but the signs are not looking good, and the features are unknown / lacking from what I am seeing.
The new Charger has large shoes to fill and the start for this design doesn't look good from where I sit...
There is more than one aspect that makes a car desirable, the design, the "powerplant", quality, and I will list the last aspect as features, (think of a Cadillac vs a loaded Oldsmobile - the Cadillac commands more money because it's a Cadillac).
The Charger sort of has a desirable design, but the powerplant is more like a 4 cylinder than Hemi, (some might say it has 500ish EV horses, but its not the same as ICE - not even close), the quality is an unknown at this point, but the signs are not looking good, and the features are unknown / lacking from what I am seeing.
The new Charger has large shoes to fill and the start for this design doesn't look good from where I sit...
-
1
- Show All